Last updated: 26 July 2026
Handing the preparation of an immigration file to a service provider raises a fair question: am I exposing myself? This page answers it with the applicable texts, everywhere in Canada. In short: delegating tasks to a non-licensee is expressly provided for by the rules that govern you, on condition that the provider neither represents nor advises anyone. That is precisely the line Vizir never crosses.
This is the provision that creates the offence of unauthorized representation. It targets anyone who, for consideration, represents or advises a person in connection with an application or proceeding under the Act:
"Subject to this section, no person shall knowingly, directly or indirectly, represent or advise a person for consideration, or offer to do so, in connection with the submission of an expression of interest [...] or a proceeding or application under this Act."
Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, s. 91(1)
Section 91(2) sets out who is exempt: lawyers in good standing with a provincial law society and notaries in good standing with the Chambre des notaires du Québec; other members in good standing of a law society or of the Chambre, including paralegals; and members in good standing of the College of Immigration and Citizenship Consultants.
In other words, the law is not concerned with who prepares the documents. It is concerned with who represents and who advises. Here is exactly where Vizir sits:
| Act | Who performs it |
|---|---|
| Being named as representative (form IMM 5476) | You, never Vizir. Vizir appears on no designation form |
| Advising the client, setting the strategy | You alone. Any substantive question from your client is escalated to you unanswered |
| Communicating with IRCC or the Quebec ministry | You alone. Vizir has no channel to the authorities |
| Signing, filing, validating | You alone. Nothing goes out without your validation |
| Requesting documents from the client, checking them, assembling the bundle | Vizir, under your supervision |
Vizir is therefore not a representative within the meaning of the Act, and cannot become one by accident: the service has neither the channel, nor the mandate, nor the ability to address the authorities.
This is not a grey area we went looking for. It is written in the Code of Professional Conduct for Licensees of the College of Immigration and Citizenship Consultants:
"For greater certainty, a licensee may delegate certain tasks relating to immigration or citizenship consulting services to a person who is not a licensee, provided that they ensure that the person does not represent or advise anyone in contravention [of section 91 of IRPA]."
Code of Professional Conduct for College of Immigration and Citizenship Consultants Licensees, SOR/2022-128, s. 38(3)
The same section sets the two conditions that come with it, and Vizir is built to meet them:
Lawyers, notaries and paralegals: the use of non-lawyer staff under supervision is likewise governed by your law society or by the Chambre des notaires, with rules that vary between provinces. We do not reproduce them here: your regulator is the source, and the links appear in point 4. The principle that protects you is the same everywhere: supervision remains yours, and professional secrecy is not waived by using a provider bound by confidentiality.
There is no single Canadian statute on this. Three provinces have their own private-sector law, deemed substantially similar to the federal one; elsewhere, the federal law applies.
| Where you practise | Applicable law | Oversight body |
|---|---|---|
| Quebec | Act respecting the protection of personal information in the private sector (as amended by Law 25) | Commission d'accès à l'information du Québec |
| Alberta | Personal Information Protection Act (PIPA) | Information and Privacy Commissioner of Alberta |
| British Columbia | Personal Information Protection Act (PIPA) | Information and Privacy Commissioner for British Columbia |
| All other provinces Ontario, Manitoba, Saskatchewan, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Island, Newfoundland and Labrador | Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA) | Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada |
| Yukon, Northwest Territories, Nunavut | PIPEDA | Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada |
One point many practitioners miss, and it concerns you directly: even in Alberta, British Columbia and Quebec, PIPEDA continues to apply to information transferred across provincial or national borders. As soon as a file crosses a border, the federal regime applies on top of your own.
Our choice: apply the strictest regime to everyone. Rather than adjusting our practices to the firm's province, we apply the Quebec requirements, currently the strictest in Canada, to every file: consent obtained from each person concerned, a privacy impact assessment before any disclosure outside Quebec, contractual framing of providers, and a log of every access kept for seven years. An Ontario or Alberta firm using Vizir therefore sits above what its own law requires.
The technical measures are set out on the Security page, and the detail of processing in our privacy policy.
Your professional obligations come from your regulator, not from us. These are the competent bodies, as listed by IRCC:
We verify your licence against one of these registers before opening an access, and one licence gives entitlement to one account only. That is also a protection for you: no unauthorized practitioner uses the tool you use.
We would rather write it plainly than let you believe the service relieves you of anything.
On request, before we receive a single document:
Every regulatory statement on this page can be verified. We cite official sources only, and we state the date of our last check.
This page describes the applicable framework and where Vizir sits within it. It is not legal advice. Your obligations flow from your regulator, your college and the laws applicable in your province; where there is any doubt, they are the ones to consult.